In a shocking turn of events, the beleaguered nation of Zimbabwe finds itself turning to its neighbor, Zambia, for a lifeline in the midst of its dire political and economic crisis. The once-mighty ruling party, ZANU PF, which has faced accusations of being illegitimate, pestilential, and parasitic, is now seeking assistance from a country it once vowed never to emulate.

Zimbabwe’s political landscape took an unexpected twist with the surprising victory of Zambia’s current president, who had previously led the opposition party. This unexpected win sent shockwaves through the corridors of power in Zimbabwe, where ZANU PF had been pursuing a one-party state aspiration, seemingly at any cost, even unconstitutionally.

For years, ZANU PF had maintained that only so-called “revolutionary parties” should hold power, regardless of their impact on inequality, poverty, and the well-being of the people. Their insistence on clinging to power had isolated Zimbabwe on the international stage, as they pursued a misguided “look east” policy that ultimately failed to deliver any meaningful results.

Now, faced with a crumbling economy, an overwhelmed national grid, and growing desperation, ZANU PF has turned to Zambia for assistance. They are seeking to supplement their struggling national grid with electricity supplies from Zambia, despite their earlier vow never to become a “flourishing and thriving constitutional liberal democracy” like their neighbor.

By making this request, ZANU PF seems to be signaling its determination to establish a one-party state, even if it leads to the collapse and failure of the nation. This one-party state would inevitably result in the fusion of all three branches of government, leading to a partisan, politicized, inefficient, and compromised system.

Tyranny, terrorism, oppression, and authoritarianism could become the norm under such a regime. The neglect of the welfare of the people would be evident in the severe deficiencies in affordable, prompt, and guaranteed service delivery of decent quality.

Zimbabwe’s plea for help from Zambia underscores the dire state of affairs in the country. It is a stark reminder of the consequences of clinging to power at all costs and pursuing policies that isolate a nation from the international community.

As Zimbabwe seeks assistance from its neighbor, it is a reminder that political leaders must prioritize the well-being and prosperity of their people over their own political aspirations. The people of Zimbabwe deserve a government that is committed to their welfare, rather than one that pursues its own agenda at their expense.

In the end, the fate of Zimbabwe hangs in the balance, and its future remains uncertain. Whether it can overcome its current crisis and emerge as a prosperous, democratic nation will depend on the choices made by its leaders and the international community’s willingness to provide support. For now, Zimbabwe’s desperate cry for help serves as a sobering reminder of the consequences of political hubris and isolation.